One of the distinguishing features of elders is that leadership in the New Testament is almost always described in the plural. Churches were led by a team of elders, not a single individual. This shared leadership provided accountability, protection against authoritarianism, and a diversity of gifts in guiding the congregation. Elders were responsible for teaching the Word, protecting the flock from falsehood, and equipping the church for ministry.
Deacons: Serving the body
If elders are tasked with spiritual oversight, deacons are entrusted with service. The prototype for deacons is found in Acts 6, where seven men were appointed to oversee the daily distribution of food so that the apostles could devote themselves to prayer and the ministry of the Word. While the title “deacon” (meaning “servant”) is not explicitly used in Acts 6, the pattern of service established there shaped the office as it developed.
RELATED: Church Planting: Why Structure Is Essential
Deacons are highlighted in 1 Timothy 3 with their own list of qualifications. They too must be people of integrity, tested and proven, faithful in their walk with Christ, and diligent in their care for others. Their role is not one of preaching or teaching, but of ensuring that the practical needs of the congregation are met. This includes caring for the poor, stewarding resources, and supporting the mission of the church in tangible ways.
Why biblical church leadership structure matters
It might be tempting to view church governance as a secondary issue, but the New Testament emphasizes order, accountability, and clarity in leadership for the good of the church. A biblical church leadership structure provides several benefits.
First, it creates accountability. Elders serve alongside one another, checking each other’s blind spots, while deacons ensure that no leader becomes isolated from the real needs of the people. Second, it promotes balance. Elders focus on prayer, preaching, and shepherding, while deacons handle practical concerns, preventing burnout and ensuring that no one role becomes overloaded. Finally, it models humility and service. Leaders in the church are not rulers in the worldly sense, but servants who follow Christ’s example of self-giving love.
Contemporary challenges
Modern churches often wrestle with how closely they should follow the New Testament model. Some denominations adopt a presbyterian system with multiple elders guiding the church, while others retain a single pastor as the primary leader. Some churches have deacon boards that function more like corporate trustees, while others see deacons as hands-on servants. The challenge for every congregation is to discern how faithfully their governance reflects the biblical vision of servant leadership rather than cultural or corporate expectations.
RELATED: The Link Between Church Structure and Growth
Moving forward with wisdom
A healthy church does not simply copy the structures of the early church without thought, nor does it ignore them as outdated. Instead, it seeks to apply the principles of Scripture with wisdom. Elders are to be men of prayer and teaching, guiding the congregation in faithfulness to Christ. Deacons are to serve with compassion and diligence, ensuring that no need goes unmet. Both roles are crucial, and both reflect Christ’s servant-hearted leadership.
Ultimately, church governance is not about power but about service. The biblical church leadership structure exists to ensure that the people of God are fed, cared for, and guided in holiness. When elders and deacons serve together in humility, the church reflects the beauty of Christ’s body—ordered, equipped, and ready for mission.
